11/16/2021 — an agent wrote he was not comfortable closing the case without raising issues, and was not thrilled with wording stating PIN "concurs" with the decision not to pursue rather than PIN "directing" them not to pursue (p.1).
p.1"Don't Want to Close" Concerns Email Chain (2021)
Key Insights
AI-generated from the sourced claims — verify against the documents.
An agent was not comfortable closing the case without raising issues and objected to wording that PIN 'concurs' with the decision not to pursue rather than PIN 'directing' them not to pursue.
The agent acknowledged canvassers were not paid per-registration but argued they still submitted fraudulent applications, though proving 'willfully' would be difficult.
An external email was to memorialize 'PIN's agreement with the decisions of the USAO and FBI to not seek prosecution here,' copying USAO-W.D. Mich.
6 sourced claims
11/11/2021 — an agent, citing DOJ Public Integrity Section's "Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses" (December 2017), raised concerns about whether closing was appropriate, quoting: election fraud includes conduct intended to corrupt voter registration (pg. 22); submitting fictitious names to election officers (52 U.S.C. §§ 1037(c) [OCR], 20511(2)) (pg. 24); providing false name/address/residence information (pg. 25); and 52 U.S.C. § 10307(c) provisions on false information and payments (pg. 39–43) (p.1–2).
p.1The agent acknowledged it did not appear canvassers were paid per-registration, but argued they still submitted fraudulent applications and that proving "willfully" would be difficult; he wanted concerns raised before closing (p.2).
p.211/3/2021 (external CRM email) — a party would send an email memorializing "PIN's agreement with the decisions of the USAO and FBI to not seek prosecution here," copying USAO-W.D. Mich. (p.2).
p.2The manual passage on "bounty-hunting" (paying per-registration) is quoted at length: it can motivate forging registrations, overloads clerk offices with bogus registrations before an election, and prosecutors should consider charging both individuals and the organizations that employ and pay them under Section 10307(c) (p.2).
p.210/20/2021 — prior discussion of the current state of the investigation, results of the financial review, and the Michigan Attorney General's Office casefile; request for a letter on DOJ/PIN's view on concurrence/nonconcurrence (p.2–3).
p.2Page evidence
"Don't Want to Close" Concerns Email Chain (2021) · p.3

Page OCR text
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE BY COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT WARRINGTON on 10 July 2026 us. Would you be able to provide an undated letter regarding DOJ/PIN's view on concurrence/nonconcurrence? Please don't hesitate to call with any questions or if you need additional information. Thanks,