PIN concurred in the full grand-jury investigation into the alleged voter-registration fraud, limited to applications where (1) the purported applicant does not exist / appears fabricated ("unable to locate" with incorrect associated information); and (2) signatures are the same or substantially similar to signatures on other applications (suggesting one person signed multiple); this did NOT extend to applications with names of actual persons bearing a unique signature (p.1).
p.1PIN Full-Investigation Concurrence / 20-Application Database Check
Key Insights
AI-generated from the sourced claims — verify against the documents.
The investigation was limited to applications where the applicant appears fabricated or where signatures are substantially similar, and did not extend to applications with real persons bearing unique signatures.
PIN directed that no federal public statement be made without conferring with PIN, and that consultation is required before pursuing criminal charges or where venue is lacking.
Of 20 randomly selected applications, seven contain completely fabricated information, four contain a real name but mismatched DOB/DL/SSN, one contains a real name but mismatched middle name, one is for someone who does not appear to have ever lived in Muskegon with a fabricated address, and seven contain all or nearly all correct information.
5 sourced claims
PIN directed consultation before pursuing criminal charges or where venue is lacking, and stated no federal public statement should be made without conferring with PIN (p.1).
p.1The FBI completed database checks on 20 randomly selected applications with apparently different handwriting from those the Muskegon Clerk flagged; compared name, last-four SSN, MI DL number, DOB, gender, address, and phone (p.1).
p.1Per-application findings (#1–#20) list "name located / unable to locate," address existence, and DOB/SSN/phone matches (p.1–2).
p.1Summary of the 20: seven applications contain completely fabricated information; four contain a real name but mismatched DOB/DL/SSN; one contains a real name but mismatched middle name; one is for someone who does not appear to have ever lived in Muskegon with a fabricated address; seven contain all or nearly all correct information (p.2).
p.2Page evidence
PIN Full-Investigation Concurrence / 20-Application Database Check · p.2

Page OCR text
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE BY COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT WARRINGTON on 10 July 2026 #9 — Unable to locate anyone by that name. Address does not exist. Phone is inactive, but returns to a different name. #10 — Name located. DOB matches. SS# does not match. Address does not match. #11 —-— Name located. DOB and SS# match. Address doesn’t exist. Doesn’t appear to have ever lived in Muskegon. #12 — Name located. All information matches except phone number is inactive. #13 — Name located. All information matches except phone number is inactive. #14 — Name located. Deceased, but was alive at the time of registration. All information matched except address. #15 — Unable to locate anyone by that name and DOB. Address does not exist. Phone is inactive. #16 — Unable to locate anyone by that name and DOB. Address does not exist. Phone is inactive. #17 — Name located. DOB matches. Formerly lived at the address. Driver’s license number is wrong. #18 — Name located. DOB, SS#, and address match. Phone number is inactive. #19 — Unable to locate anyone by that name and DOB. Address is a park. Unable to locate phone number. #20 — Name located. DOB, SS#, and address match. Phone number is inactive. Based on these results, it appears as though: - seven of the applications contain completely fabricated information. - four of the applications contain a real name, but DOB, driver’s license, and/or SS# don’t match. - one of the applications contain a real name, but middle name doesn’t match. - one of the applications is for someone who does not appear to have ever lived in Muskegon and has a fabricated address. - seven of the applications contain all correct or nearly all correct information.